16 Aug 2008

Modern tajmahal

THE LOTUS TEMPLE

1.The grand “Lotus Temple” is termed by many as the Taj of modern India.It is “the most visited building in the world, according to a CNN report” also “the most visited building in India, surpassing even the Taj Mahal with some 4.5 million visitors a year.”

2.The vast lawns, the massive white structure, the high ceiling Prayer Hall, and a temple without idols standing so close to an ancient Hindu temple aroused the interest of all and sundry.

3.It is made of marble,cement,dolomite and sand. It reaches a height of more than 40m. One can see 27 giant white petals of marble in a lotus shape,springing from nine pools and walkways indicative of the nine unifying spiritual paths of the Bahai’s faith.

4.It is located in Kalkaji, south of Delhi and is shaped like a half opened Lotus flower.It was completed in 1986 and serves as the Mother Temple of the Indian subcontinent. It has won numerous architectural awards and been featured in hundreds of newspaper and magazine articles.

5.The architect was an Iranian, who now lives in Canada, named Fariborz Sahba. The major part of the funds needed to buy this land was donated by Ardishír Rustampúr of Hyderabad, who gave his entire life savings for this purpose in 1953.

6.Since its inauguration to public worship in December 1986, the Bah?’? House of Worship in New Delhi, India has drawn to its portals more than 50 million visitors, making it the most visited edifice in the world, its numbers surpassing those of the visitors to the Eiffel Tower and even the Taj Mahal.

7.This “House of Worship of the Indian subcontinent” joins six other Bah?’? temples around the world. Each of these Houses of Worship, while sharing some basic design concepts, has its own distinct cultural identity embodying the principle of unity in diversity.

8.The structure of the House of Worship is composed of three ranks of nine petals; each springing from a podium which elevates the building above the surrounding plain. The first two ranks curve inward, embracing the inner dome; the third layer curves outward to form canopies over the nine entrances. The petals, constructed of reinforced white concrete cast in place, are clad in white marble panels, performed to surface profiles and patterns related to the geometry.

9.The double layered interior dome, modelled on the innermost portion of the lotus, is comprised of 54 ribs with concrete shells between. The central hall is ringed by nine arches that provide the main support for the superstructure. Nine reflecting pools surround the building on the outside, their form suggesting the green leaves of the lotus flower.

10.. Fariborz Sahba spent 10 years in designing and project management, and with the help of a team of about 800 engineers, technicians, artisans and workers brought to realisation one of the most complicated constructions in the world.

11.To avoid construction joints, petals were concreted in a continuous operation for approximately 48 hours. Concrete was carried up the staging by women bearing 50-pound loads in baskets balanced on their heads.

12.All the steel reinforcing for the shells of the lotus petals was galvanised to avoid rust stains on the white concrete in the prevailing humid conditions, and guarantee the life of the delicate shell structure of 6 to 18 cm thick shells of the petals.

13.When the temple was first opened to the general public on January 1, 1987 they flocked to the “Lotus Temple”, as they fondly call it, from sheer curiosity.

14.Nine doors open onto a central hall, capable of holding up to 2,500 people. Slightly more than 40 meters tall, its surface shining white marble,the temple at times seems to float above its 26 acre (105,000 m²; 10.5 ha) nine surrounding ponds.

Read More - Wikipedia

INDO-US War

What would happen if an Indo US war broke out? Indian pilots are better as evinced by the two mock fights. Indians won 9 out of 10 times.

I’ll split this into two sections, nuclear and non-nuclear.

Nuclear:
India is depopulated. U.S might get hit but probably not.

Non-nuclear:
Assuming neither side is actually trying to acheive occupation of the others territory. Which is a pretty safe assumption given neither side could ever acheive that. This senario is regardless of who attacks whoever, just general estimates on how long it would take one side to destroy the others assets.

Indian nuclear stockpile destruction - around 6 hours (I’d have to double check the flight time)
Indian airforce destruction - around 2 weeks (assuming you don’t fly them all into the U.S navy’s air defence nets)
Indian navy destruction - around a month (again assuming you don’t engage U.S battlegroups head on)
Indian army seriously damaged - several months (you’d have to disperse your troops and hide your vehicles from air/sat imagery to prevent them from being targeted)

U.S would take relatively serious loses.

The best case senario for India’s military would be if the U.S attacked them, India wouldn’t need to secure foreign terroritory to base their aircraft and ships. They also wouldn’t need to figure out how to safely transport they’re huge army with limited strategic airlift. BY A Military Proffesional On A forum

**************************************************
There are some serious misconceptions out there about how air combat training is conducted so I’ve decided to write a post about how it really happens. Everybody seems to want to cite a particular exercise as proof of their point, when in reality, they have no contextual reference for these results they are referencing. Realize that I am writing from a USAF/USN/USMC/NATO perspective. If anyone else can provide some information about how it’s done elsewhere, please chime in.

Air-to-air combat is an extremely complex and dynamic undertaking. The combination of speed and the ability to maneuver in three dimensions creates an environment that is constantly changing and rarely allows any of the participants to see and understand the entire picture at once. In order to be successful in this environment, participants must be highly skilled, (reasonably) intelligent individuals who fight in these types of battles regularly.

Fighter pilots from countries all over the world are expected to use hardware purchased with national treasure to defend their homeland against attackers or attack others as directed by their leaders. In order to effectively accomplish those missions, pilots must regularly train for air combat. Air combat skills are perishable and even the best pilots are not as keen as they might be if they haven’t flown in a while – especially when flying in large force exercises where one decision may be the difference between success and failure.

Definitions: Air Combat Training (ACT) is a term used to describe a battle between similar aircraft. If 2 F-16s are fighting against 2 other F-16s, this would be an ACT war, whereas 2 F-15s fighting 2 F-16s would be termed Dissimilar Air Combat Training (DACT).

When planning a DACT exercise, planners typically will build an Offensive Counterair (OCA) strike package and Defensive Counterair (DCA) package with appropriate aircraft - this was displayed in the Cope India exercise when a strike package consisting of SU-30s, Mirages, and Jaguars attacked a target defended by F-15s. Besides designating types of aircraft and missions, planners will also draw up objectives for the exercise. These objectives can be very specific or quite broad depending on the situation.

A broad objective may be stated as “building trust between countries” or “familiarize pilots with other air forces.” More specific objectives may be “effectively integrate air forces for lane defense.” In order to accomplish these objectives, rules of engagement (ROE) will also be set.

ROE consist of weapons load, identification criteria, maneuvering limitations, tactics restrictions, and just about anything else you can think of. ROE can be pretty liberal or very restrictive, depending on the objectives, experience level of the pilots, or number and type of aircraft involved. If the objective is to “build trust” between nations, you can bet your ass that the rules are going to be damn restrictive to try to ensure there will be no accidents/dangerous or stupid stunts that would embarrass one side or the other or result in needless loss of life. This is why briefings are conducted, and “pickup games” are not allowed. (This is also the reason why this article about the Typhoons getting bounced by F-15Es is absolute *******s.) Regardless of the particular ROE established, somebody needs to be the bad guy.

In most exercises there will be a threat aircraft and weapons designated as the training aid for the other side. In U.S. exercises such as Red Flag, this will be something like a MiG-29 with aa-10s and aa-11s, and will be referred to as “opfor” or “red air.” Red air will usually consist of F-15s or F-16s (or whatever they can get) and will do their best to simulate that threat by limiting their radar modes, lock ranges, tactics, etc. “Blue air” will fly with their normal weapons loadout and will normally not have any restrictions other than operating their systems in a training/peacetime mode. There may be other restrictions imposed based on the objectives. Typically, the threat capabilities will start out low – short range missiles and very benign tactics, then increase as the exercise continues, as long as the blue air players are learning something and they are ready to progress to the next level. If the blue air fighters are getting their butts handed to them, the threat level will remain low, but if they are doing well, the threat capability will increase so the training is useful.

Notice that the red air players are training aids. They are supposed to follow the rules and die like men when blue air is executing well. If, however, the blue air screws something up and they have an opportunity to kick some tail, they are expected to do so. Violating the ROE by using a capability that is restricted, shooting beyond a specified range, or not adhering to an established ID criteria is considered a training rule violation and is dealt with severely. Several pilots have been sent home from exercises and have even been reassigned because they didn’t like to follow the rules.

By now it should becoming clear why one side or the other in these exercises often has a larger kill:loss ratio than the other. Red air is supposed to die – even if there are more capable aircraft on the red side. This is how many of the “surprising” results occur in large exercises – the threat level is tailored to the training needs of the blue air so they can learn from their mistakes in the debrief.

When conducting the debrief, kills must be assessed in order to find out what really happened. In order to do this, pilots must review the recording of the mission so they can evaluate their targeting and weapons employment. Red and blue air will get together, exchange data, and together decide who shot who and when. This is often an inexact science, however, with ACMI monitoring and extensive recording equipment in the aircraft, it is getting better. With results in hand, the blue fighters can then determine what they did wrong, and how to do better next time. This training is very effective for the blue air, but it usually sucks for red. What about exercises with real “threat” aircraft like MiG-29s, MiG-25s, etc? This is obviously the best training there can be, however, there is a problem.

When participating in an international exercise, both sides are probably going to hold some information back. This is not a “you show me yours, I’ll show you mine” game. In many cases, the shot data/weapons performance is classified, and not releasable to those on the other side. This is exactly the case in Cope India 04.

How do you debrief an engagement when neither side wants to say what really happened? Nobody is going to walk into the debrief and say “I shot that guy at this time and this range with this missile,” because they are basically giving away their capabilities. There are a couple of ways to deal with this, one of which is to not relay any of the shot information, but to merely say “that guy is dead at this time.” In that situation, no information (other than the f-pole) is released to the other side. However, astute people on the other side can extrapolate the data and figure out approximately when the shot was fired and can have a pretty good idea as to the performance of the missile. The other thing you can do is to establish a theoretical missile, with a nominal range to be used by both sides. This levels the playing field and rewards the side which executes better, rather than the side with the longer range missiles.

Detailed assessments that would normally take place to validate shots can’t/won’t happen in an exercise like this, therefore the overall results are not really accurate. However, as you say, they most certainly will debrief to get some results regardless of the potential inaccuracies. How valid the results are depends on how the exercise was planned.

As you can see, the results of these exercises (especially those released to the public) are quite likely not accurate. And, for one side or the other to claim victory in one of these exercises is either dishonest or just plain ignorance. Normally, the results are released as a series of politically correct statements such as those we’ve seen by the authorities after Cope India. Both sides are happy, they learned a lot, and can’t wait to do it again.

It should be noted that these types of exercises are planned many months in advance. A key part of the training syllabus is to agree on the types of scenarios to be performed during initial planning.

Most of the learning experience occurs on the ground, not in the air. The evolution from Air Tasking Order to Mission Planning/C3I/Asset Coordination to Aircraft Generation is where air battles are won or lost. The mechanics of flying airplanes and shooting off ordnance is icing on the cake.

I’m certainly not trying to stifle the spirited debate that goes on here. It’s fun reading the arguments for and against various aircraft, however, be careful when you’re quoting the results of some exercise when making your point!

I’m only saying that without details, all of this, “my airplane kicked your airplane’s butt” is entertaining, but silly. One valuable part of the exercise is simply watching how the other side operates, what kind of tactics they use (they may have been “modified” along with the weapons), how they talk on the radio, etc. Obviously, the technology represented by the Su-30s is of great interest to the USAF also.

I Found This Article On A Forum And was written by a NATO planner.
Read More

Beijing olympics-fact sheet

1.The 2008 Summer Olympic Games, officially known as the Games of the XXIX Olympiad will be celebrated in Beijing, People’s Republic of China from August 8 to August 24, 2008.

2.Ten thousand, five hundred athletes are expected to compete in 302 events in 28 sports.

3.The Olympic games were awarded to Beijing after an exhaustive ballot of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) on July 13, 2001.

4.The official logo of the games, titled “Dancing Beijing,” features a stylised calligraphic character jīng (京, meaning capital), referencing the host city.

5.The mascots of Beijing 2008 are the five Fuwa, each representing both a colour of the Olympic rings and a symbol of Chinese culture.The five Fuwa are named Beibei, Jingjing, Huanhuan, Yingying, and Nini.

6.The Olympic slogan,

One World, One Dream

, calls upon the world to unite in the Olympic spirit.It was chosen from over 210,000 entries submitted from around the world.

7.A total of 37 venues will be used to host the events including 12 newly constructed venues.

8.Its largest architectural pieces will be the Beijing National Stadium, Beijing National Indoor Stadium, Beijing National Aquatics Centre, Olympic Green Convention Centre, Olympic Green, and Beijing Wukesong Culture & Sports Center.

9.The centrepiece of the 2008 Summer Olympics will be the Beijing National Stadium, nicknamed the “Bird nest” because of its nest-like skeletal structure.

10.During the games, 2,500 large-size buses and 4,500 minibuses will be operated by a total of 8,000 drivers to transport people across various venues.

11.The design of the Olympic Torch is based on traditional scrolls and uses a traditional Chinese design known as the “Propitious Clouds” (祥云). The torch is designed to remain lit in 65 kilometer per hour winds, and in rain of up to 50 millimeters per hour.

12.The relay, with the theme Journey of Harmony, is expected to last 130 days and carry the torch 137,000 km (85,000 mi)—the longest distance of any Olympic torch relay since the tradition began at the 1936 Berlin Games.

13.A total of 21,880 torchbearers have been selected from around the world by various organizations and entities.

14.The flame was carried to the top of Mount Everest on a 108 km (67 mi) long “highway” scaling the Tibetan side of the mountain especially built for the relay.

15.The opening ceremony of the Olympics in Beijing will be held in the Beijing National Stadium, and begin at 8:08pm CST (12:08 UTC) on 8 August 2008.

16.United States will bring about 600 competitors to the games, their largest Olympic team thus far. On the Other hand Afghanistan will be represented by just four competitors.

17.South African swimmer Natalie du Toit, five time gold medalist at the Athens Paralympics in 2004, has qualified to compete at the Beijing Olympics,thus making history by becoming the first amputee to qualify for the Olympic Games since Olivér Halassy in 1936. Natalia Partyka (who was born without a right forearm) will compete in Table Tennis for Poland.

18.The 2008 Olympics will see the return of 28 sports, and will hold 302 events (165 men’s events, 127 women’s events, and 10 mixed events), one event more in total than in Athens.

19.The Olympic motto “Citius, Altius, Fortius” is Latin for “Faster, Higher, Braver,” but is universally accepted to mean “Swifter, Higher, Stronger.”

Athens vs Beijing

Read More Wikipedia
Beijing National Stadium -Technical View

20.Participating countries in Beijing Olympics with no. of participants
• Afghanistan (4)
• Albania (11)
• Algeria ( 8)
• American Samoa (4)
• Andorra (5)
• Angola (26)
• Antigua and Barbuda
• Argentina (13 8)
• Armenia (25)
• Aruba (2)
• Australia (433)
• Austria (72)
• Azerbaijan (39)
• Bahamas (19)
• Bahrain (11)
• Bangladesh (5)
• Barbados ( 8)
• Belarus (20 8)
• Belgium (94)
• Belize (3)
• Benin (3)
• Bermuda (6)
• Bhutan (2)
• Bolivia (6)
• Bosnia and Herzegovina (5)
• Botswana (2)
• Brazil (277)
• British Virgin Islands (2)
• Brunei (2)
• Bulgaria (72)
• Burkina Faso (4)
• Burundi (3)
• Cambodia (6)
• Cameroon (3)
• Canada (331)
• Cape Verde (3)
• Cayman Islands (3)
• Central African Republic (3)
• Chad (2)
• Chile (27)
• China (639)
• Chinese Taipei (80)
• Colombia (64)
• Comoros (3)
• DR Congo (2)
• Congo (3)
• Cook Islands (4)
• Costa Rica (6)
• Côte d’Ivoire
• Croatia (106)
• Cuba (149)
• Cyprus (17)
• Czech Republic (130)
• Denmark (83)
• Djibouti (4)
• Dominica
• Dominican Republic (23)
• Ecuador (25)
• Egypt (103)
• El Salvador (11)
• Equatorial Guinea (3)
• Eritrea (11)
• Estonia (47)
• Ethiopia (36)
• Fiji (6)
• Finland (55)
• France (323)
• FS Micronesia
• FYR Macedonia (7)
• Gabon (4)
• Gambia (3)
• Georgia (35)
• Germany (439)
• Ghana (9)
• Great Britain (313)
• Greece (159)
• Grenada (1)
• Guam (5)
• Guatemala (12)
• Guinea (1)
• Guinea-Bissau (3)
• Guyana (4)
• Haiti (1)
• Honduras (25)
• Hong Kong, China (34)
• Hungary (171)
• Iceland (26)
• India (57)
• Indonesia (24)
• Iran (55)
• Iraq (2)
• Ireland (54)
• Israel (43)
• Italy (344)
• Jamaica (56)
• Japan (351)
• Jordan (7)
• Kazakhstan (132)
• Kenya (56)
• Kiribati (3)
• South Korea (267)
• North Korea (63)
• Kuwait (6)
• Kyrgyzstan (21)
• Laos (4)
• Latvia (49)
• Lebanon (5)
• Lesotho (4)
• Liberia (3)
• Libya (7)
• Liechtenstein (2)
• Lithuania (69)
• Luxembourg (12)
• Madagascar (4)
• Malawi (4)
• Malaysia (27)
• Maldives (4)
• Mali (12)
• Malta (6)
• Marshall Islands (5)
• Mauritania (2)
• Mauritius (3)
• Mexico (85)
• Moldova (31)
• Monaco (2)
• Mongolia (29)
• Montenegro (17)
• Morocco (49)
• Mozambique (6)
• Myanmar (6)
• Namibia (9)
• Nauru (1)
• Nepal (7)
• Netherlands (245)
• Netherlands Antilles (3)
• New Zealand (182)
• Nicaragua (6)
• Niger
• Nigeria (33)
• Norway (85)
• Oman (4)
• Pakistan (21)
• Palau (4)
• Palestine (4)
• Panama (3)
• Papua New Guinea (7)
• Paraguay (5)
• Peru (12)
• Philippines (15)
• Poland (26 8)
• Portugal (7 8)
• Puerto Rico (22)
• Qatar (22)
• Romania (102)
• Russia (467)
• Rwanda (4)
• Saint Kitts and Nevis
• Saint Lucia
• Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
• São Tomé and Príncipe (3)
• Samoa (6)
• San Marino (4)
• Saudi Arabia (16)
• Senegal ( 8)
• Serbia (92)
• Seychelles ( 8)
• Sierra Leone (2)
• Singapore (25)
• Slovakia (57)
• Slovenia (62)
• Solomon Islands (3)
• Somalia (2)
• South Africa (136)
• Spain (287)
• Sri Lanka ( 8)
• Sudan (9)
• Suriname (4)
• Swaziland (4)
• Sweden (97)
• Switzerland (84)
• Syria (7)
• Tajikistan (13)
• Tanzania
• Thailand (25)
• Timor-Leste (2)
• Togo (1)
• Tonga (3)
• Trinidad and Tobago (2 8)
• Tunisia (32)
• Turkey (6 8)
• Turkmenistan (10)
• Tuvalu (3)
• Uganda (11)
• Ukraine (54)
• United Arab Emirates (5)
• United States (596)
• Uruguay (12)
• Uzbekistan (5 8)
• Vanuatu (3)
• Venezuela (109)
• Vietnam (21)
• Virgin Islands (5)
• Yemen (5)
• Zambia (7)
• Zimbabwe (13)

Origin Of Hockey

Origin of hockey
A crude form of hockey was played in Egypt 4,000 years ago, and in Ethiopia about 1000 BC. Various museums offer evidence that a form of the game was played by Romans and Greeks, and by the Aztec Indians in South America several centuries before Columbus landed in the New World. The modern game of hockey evolved in England in the mid-18th century, primarily in schools. Hockey made its first steps toward an international federation when in 1909 the Hockey Association in England and the Belgium Hockey Association agreed to regulate international hockey.

The French Association followed soon after. Hockey took its most important step forward in 1924 when the International Hockey Federation, the world governing body for the sport, was founded in Paris under the initiative of Frenchman Paul Léautey. Mr Léautey, who became the first president of the federation, was moved to action after hockey’s omission from the 1924 Paris Olympic Games. The women’s game developed quickly in many countries and in 1927, the International Federation of Women’s Hockey Associations (IFWHA) was formed. The founding members were Australia, Denmark, England, Ireland, Scotland, South Africa, the United States of America and Wales. The two organisations united in 1982 to form the FIH.
HOCKEY

The International Hockey Federation grew quickly after its formation. Denmark joined in 1925, the Dutch in 1926, Turkey in 1927, and in 1928 - the year of the Amsterdam Olympics - Germany, Poland, Portugal and India joined. India’s addition marked the membership of the first non-European country.
By 1964, 50 countries were affiliated with the FIH, as well as three continental associations - Africa, Pan-America and Asia. In 1974, there were 71 members. The International Hockey Federation now consists of five continental associations - Europe and Oceania have since joined - and 118 member associations.

Hockey today
The work of the International Hockey Federation is led by the FIH President, Secretary General and Treasurer, working together with an executive board, the FIH council, a number of instrumental committees, and the staff at its Lausanne headquarters. The FIH works in co-operation with both the national and continental organisations to ensure consistency and unity in hockey worldwide. The FIH not only regulates the sport, but is responsible for its development and promotion.

Hockey at the Olympics
Hockey has been an Olympic sport since 1908 and celebrates its 100 years at the Olympics in Beijing. The men’s competition has been on every Olympic program, except in 1912 and 1924. The women’s competition began in 1980. This year, 12 men’s and 12 women’s teams are participating.

INDIAN HOCKEY IN OLYMPICS

India first participated in Olympics in 1900 in Paris. The country was represented by Norman Pritchard, an Anglo Indian who was holidaying in Paris during that time. He bagged two silver medals in 200m. dash and 200m hurdles. Then after a gap of 20 years India again participated with two athletes in 1920 Antwerp Olympics and with eight members in 1924 Paris Olympics.

But the more organised, official representation by India, was made in 1928 Amsterdam, with the formation of Indian Olympic Association in 1927. Dorabji Tata was the first president and Dr A C Northern of Young Men’s Christian Association, Madras was the secretary. That year, Indian Hockey team participated in their first Olympic hockey event and won the gold medal under the captaincy of Jaipal Singh. For the next 6 successive Olympics spanning 28 years from 1928-1956, Indians retained their gold medal for the hockey event. Hockey wizard Dhyan Chand played a major role in Indian victory in the first three successive wins. It was definitely the golden era of Indian Hockey in Olympics, during which India played 24 matches and won all 24, scored 178 goals (at an average of 7.43 goals per match) and conceded only 7 goals. India again won two more gold medals in Olympic hockey in the 1964 Tokyo Olympics and the 1980 Moscow Olympics.

Read More- WGames

Read More- TGames

Read More- SGames

Read More- VGames

Read More- RGames

Read More - JUDO

Read More - Football

FACTS

1. The longest one-syllable word in the English language is "screeched."

2. "Dreamt" is the only English word that ends in the letters "mt"

3. Almonds are members of the peach family.

4. The symbol on the "pound" key (#) is called an octothorpe.

5. The dot over the letter 'i' is called a tittle.

6. Ingrown toenails are hereditary.

7. The word "set" has more definitions than any other word in the English language.

8. "Underground" is the only word in the English language that begins and ends with the letters "und."

9. There are only four words in the English language which end in "-dous": tremendous,
horrendous, stupendous, and hazardous.

10. The longest word in the English language, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is "pneumonoultramicros copicsilicovolca noconiosis."

11. The only other word with the same amount of letters is its plural: pneumonoultramicros copicsilicovolca noconiosesl.

12. The longest place-name still in use is "Taumatawhakatangiha ngakoauauotamate aturipukakapikim aungahoronukupok aiwe-nuakit natahu", a New Zealand hill.

13. Los Angeles's full name is "El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora la Reinade los Angeles de Porciuncula" and can be abbreviated to 3.63% of its size,L.A.

14. An ostrich's eye is bigger than its brain.

15. Tigers have striped skin, not just striped fur.

16. Alfred Hitchcock didn't have a belly button. It was eliminated when he was sewn up after surgery.

17. Telly Savalas and Louis Armstrong died on their birthdays.

18. Donald Duck's middle name is Fauntleroy.

19. The muzzle of a lion is like a fingerprint - no two lions have the same pattern of whiskers.

20. A pregnant goldfish is called a twit.

21. There is a seven-letter word in the English language that contains ten words without rearranging any of its letters, "therein": the,there, he, in, rein, her, here, ere, therein, herein.

22. Dueling is legal in Paraguay as long as both parties are registered blood donors.

23. A goldfish has a memory span of three seconds.

24. It's impossible to sneeze with your eyes open.

25. Cranberries are sorted for ripeness by bouncing them; a fully ripened cranberry can be
dribbled like a basketball.

26. The letters KGB stand for Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti

27. 'Stewardesses' is the longest English word that is typed with only the left hand.

28. The combination "ough" can be pronounced in nine different ways; the following sentence
contains them all: "A rough-coated, dough-faced, thoughtful ploughman strode through the streets of Scarborough; after falling into a slough, he coughed and hiccoughed."

29. The only 15 letter word that can be spelled without repeating a letter is uncopyrightable.

30. Facetious and abstemious contain all the vowels in the correct order, as does arsenious, meaning "containing arsenic."

31. Emus and kangaroos cannot walk backwards, and are on the Australian seal for that reason.

32. Cats have over one hundred vocal sounds, while dogs only have about ten.

33. The word "Checkmate" in chess comes from the Persian phrase "Shah Mat," which means "the king is dead."

34. The reason firehouses have circular stairways is from the days of yore when the engines
were pulled by horses. The horses were stabled on the ground floor and figured out how to walk
up straight staircases.

35.Coca-Cola was originally green.

36.The most common name in the world is Mohammed.

37.The name of all the continents end with the same letter that they startwith.

38.The strongest muscle in the body is the tongue.

39.There are two credit cards for every person in the United States.

40.TYPEWRITER is the longest word that can be made using the letters only one row ! of the keyboard.

41.Women blink nearly twice as much as men!!

42.You can't kill yourself by holding your breath.

43.It is impossible to lick your elbow.

44.People say "Bless you" when you sneeze because when you sneeze, your heartstops for a millisecond.

45.It is physically impossible for pigs to look up into the sky.

46.The "sixth sick sheik's sixth sheep's sick" is said to be the toughest tongue twister in the English language.

47.If you sneeze too hard, you can fracture a rib.

48.If you try to suppress asneeze, you can rupturea blood vessel in your head or neck and die.

49.Each king in a deck of playing cards represents great king from history.

50. Spades - King David
Clubs - Alexander the Great
Hearts - Charlemagne
Diamonds - Julius Caesar.

51. 111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321

52.If a statue of a person in the park on a horse has both front legs in theair, the person died in battle.If the horse has one front leg in the air, the person died as a result ofwounds received in b attle. If the horse has all four legs on the ground,the person died of natural causes.

54.What do bullet proof vests, fire escapes, windshield wipers and laserprinters all have in common?
Ans. - All invented by women.

55.Question - This is the only food that doesn't spoil. What is this?
Ans. - HoneyA crocodile cannot stick its tongue out.

56.A snail can sleep for three years.

57.All polar bears are left handed.Butterflies taste with their feet.

58.Elephants are the only animals that can't jump.

59.In the last 4000 years, no new animals have been domesticated.

60.On average, people fear spiders more than they do death.

61.Shakespeare invented the word 'assassination' and 'bump'.

62.Stewardesses is the longest word typed with only the left hand.

63.The ant always falls over on its right side when intoxicated.

64.The electric chair was invented by a dentist.

65.The human heart creates enough pressure when it pumps out to the body tosquirt blood 30 feet.

66.Rats multiply so quickly that in 18 months, two rats could have overmillion descendants.

67.Wearing headphones for just an hour will increase the bacteria in your earby 700 times.

68.The cigarette lighter was invented before the match.

69.Most lipstick contains fish scales.

70.Like fingerprints, everyone's tongue print is different.

13 Aug 2008

Hypersonic Aircraft

1.The X-43 is an unmanned experimental hypersonic aircraft design with multiple planned scale variations meant to test different aspects of hypersonic flight. It is part of NASA’s Hyper-X program.

2.The initial version, the X-43A, was designed to operate at speeds greater than Mach 7, about 5,400 mph (8,050 km/h) at altitudes of 100,000 feet (30,000 m) or more.


3.NASA’s X-43A or Hyper-X air vehicle achieved a record-breaking speed of close to Mach 10 (12,000km/hr or 7,000mph) in a test flight in November 2004, which was the culmination of a three-flight test program.

4.The purpose of the program is to develop a hypersonic air vehicle powered by an air-breathing engine. Hypersonic speed is defined as speed above Mach 5 or above five times the speed of sound.

5.The X-43A is a single-use vehicle and is designed to crash into the ocean without recovery. Three of them have been built: the first was destroyed; the other two have successfully flown, with the scramjet operating for approximately 10 seconds, followed by a 10 minute glide and intentional crash.

6.The technology is planned to lead in to the development of hypersonic manned and unmanned aircraft and reusable space launch vehicles. Hypersonic propulsion systems will allow the development of very high-speed strike aircraft, manned or unmanned, capable of attack at great distances deep in hostile territory in a very short time.

7.The X-43A aircraft was a small unpiloted test vehicle measuring just over 12 feet (3.7 m) in length. The vehicle was a lifting body design, where the body of the aircraft provides a significant amount of lift for flight, rather than relying on wings. The aircraft weighed roughly 3,000 pounds or about 1,300 kilograms.

8.The Orbital Sciences Pegasus booster rocket carries the X-43A up to its test altitude of 100,000ft where the X-43A vehicle separates from the booster and flies under the power and control of its own built-in engine and pre-programmed control system.

9.The craft was created to develop and test an exotic type of engine called a supersonic-combustion ramjet, or “scramjet,” an engine variation where external combustion takes place within air that is flowing at supersonic speeds.

10.The engine of the X-43A was primarily fueled with hydrogen. In the successful test, about two pounds (or roughly one kilogram) of the fuel was used.

11.Further development

X-43B,X43C,X43D.

12.Key Data:
X-43A
Length 12ft 4in
Width 5ft 6in
Height 2ft 2in
Weight 3,000lb
Speed Mach 5, Mach 7 and Mach 10
Altitude 100,000ft
X-43B
Length 30ft to 50ft
X-43C
Speed Mach 5 to Mach 7
Length 16ft
Engine Hydrocarbon fuel scramjet engine
X-43D
Speed Mach 10 to Mach 15

Read More - Wikipedia

Read More - Largest Airplane - A380

TABLE TENNIS

1.Origin of Table Tennis

Like many other sports, table tennis began as a mild social diversion; it was probably first played – with improvised equipment – in England, during the last quarter of the 19th century. Descending, along with badminton and lawn tennis, from the ancient medieval game of tennis, it was popular at the turn of the century under its present name and various trade names such as Gossima and Whiff-Waff.

After Ping-Pong (an imitation of the sound made by the ball striking the hollow vellum battledores that were then used) was registered in 1900, the game became a fashionable craze that quickly spread through Europe, the USA and soon afterwards was introduced in Asia. After a period when it had dropped out of favour in Europe, the game was revived in England and Wales in the early twenties. National associations were formed and standardization of the rules began, in both Europe and Asia.

Table Tennis Today

Table tennis has developed into a major world-wide sport, practiced by perhaps forty million competitive players and by uncountable millions who play less seriously. However, the game itself has not changed in essence since its earliest days, though it is faster, more subtle and more demanding than it was even only twenty years ago.

Modern table tennis at national and international level is as rigorous as any sport in its demands for the highest degree of physical fitness and mental concentration, attained only by arduous training to develop natural skill.

TRITHLON

2.Origin of Triathlon

The first recorded triathlon occurred in California on September 24, 1974. It was organised by the San Diego Track and Field Club at Mission Bay and was created as an alternative to the rigors of athletic training on the track. There were 46 finishers in this first triathlon and the event consisted of 5.3-mile run, followed by a 5-mile cycle race and 600 yards of swimming in the ocean.

Over the next decade, triathlon grew by leaps and bounds and soon gained recognition throughout the world. The energetic and charismatic sport caught the attention of the International Olympic Committee. In 1988, IOC President Juan Antonio SAMARANCH arranged a meeting in Stockholm with the intention of including triathlon in the Olympic Games as quickly as possible.

The International Triathlon Union was founded in 1989 at the first ITU Congress in Avignon, France. Thirty National Federations attended, conducted elections and made preparations for the first World Championships to be held in Avignon on August 6. The official distance for triathlon was set at a 1.5km swim, a 40km cycle and a 10km run. More than 800 athletes representing 40 countries competed in the first World Championships.

Although founded in Avignon, France, ITU has maintained its headquarters in Vancouver, Canada and has grown to over 121 affiliated national federations around the world. In 1991, ITU began its World Cup series with 11 events in eight different countries. American Karen SMYERS and Brazilian Leandro MACEDO were crowed the overall winners of the series.

In 1994, at the IOC Congress in Paris, France, triathlon was awarded full medal status on the Olympic programme and will made its debut at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. With inclusion into the Olympic Games, the ITU World Cup series grew and on May 25, 2008, the 200th World Cup event was held in Madrid, Spain.

Triathlon Today

In 2008, the World Cup series included 13 events held in major cities and destinations around the globe. The series travels to Olympic venues such Beijing as well as major cities such as Madrid, Vancouver, Lisbon and Hamburg.

Each year World Championships is staged with extensive international television and media coverage. The high profile triathlon World Championships for 2009, 2010 and 2012 will be held in Gold Coast (AUS); Budapest (HUN) and Beijing (CHN) respectively.

Triathlon at the Olympic Games
In its Olympic debut at the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games, triathlon set a new Olympic attendance record with over 120,000 spectators for the women’s and men’s competitions. At the 2004 Athens Olympic Games, triathlon was one of only a few events to sell all available tickets. Triathlon will make its third appearance at the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, with the competitions specifically scheduled for primetime television exposure.

TAEKWONDO

3.Origin of Taekwondo

The history of taekwondo as a martial art can be traced back almost two millennia ago in the Korean Peninsula. For centuries, this unique self-defence martial art existed in various forms and names. In ancient times, including the Three Kingdoms Period in the Korean Peninsula, the martial art was introduced primarily as a form of physical or military training. In the 1950s, a group of leading Korean grandmasters unified the various forms of the martial art into a single system of self-defence. This unified system came to be known as taekwondo , which literally means “The Way of Kicking and Punching.” Taekwondo’s popularity soared thereafter, as its forceful and difficult techniques, combined with swiftness and grace, attracted interests from all walks of life. In 1971, taekwondo was nominated as a Korean national sport and in 1972, the Kukkiwon was established. Three years later, on May 28, 1973, the World Taekwondo Federation was founded.

Taekwondo Today

In 1975, taekwondo was accepted as a sport of the General Association of International Sports Federations (GAISF) and within five years, the World Taekwondo Federation was accepted by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) as the sole governing entity of taekwondo. Over the past three decades, taekwondo’s global popularity is nothing short of meteoric, as tens of millions of general practitioners around the world associated themselves with the proud tradition, philosophies and health benefits of taekwondo. As of 2008, the global membership of the WTF stands at 188 national associations across five continents.

Taekwondo at the Olympic Summer Games

Taekwondo entered as a demonstration sport at the 1988 Seoul Olympic Games and the 1992 Barcelona Olympic Games. On September 4, 1994, taekwondo was accepted as an official medal sport of the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games at the 103rd IOC Session in Paris, France. Taekwondo was included in the official programme in the 2004 Athens Olympic Games and will once again feature as an official sport in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games.

TENNIS

4.Origins of Tennis

The origins of tennis are a matter of dispute. Some say early versions of the game were played in ancient Egypt, a theory based on the origins of the name. They claim that the word “tennis” derives from the Egyptian town of Tinnis, and that “racquet” evolved from the Arabic word for the palm of the hand, “rahat”.

However, there is more evidence to suggest that the game originated in France in the 11th or 12th century and was played by French monks who played handball against monastery walls, or over a rope strung across a courtyard. The game was called “jeu de paume”, meaning “game of the hand”. Many believe that the name “tennis” is derived from the French “tenez”, which means “take this” or “be ready”, and was said by the server before the point began.

As the game became more popular, players began to use gloves in an attempt to avoid the build-up of calluses. Over time, wooden bats were added, and balls were made from wads of hair, wool or cork, wrapped in string and cloth or leather. In later years they were hand-stitched in felt.

The game also became popular in royal circles. King Louis X of France died after a particularly strenuous game in 1316, and Charles VII met his end after striking his head on a piece of wood over the door leading to his tennis court. This did not diminish its popularity among subsequent monarchs, who are credited with keeping the game alive.

Racquets were introduced in the 16th century, and England’s King Henry VIII built a court at Hampton Court Palace in 1530 that was replaced by Charles I in 1625 and still exists today.

The 16th century version of tennis is still played today in four countries. In France it has retained its original name of “Jeu de Paume”; it is “Royal Tennis” in Australia, “Court Tennis” in the USA and “Real Tennis” in Great Britain. The court is a cross between a tennis and a squash court. There is a net and players can bounce the ball off the walls.

During the 18th century “lawn tennis” emerged in Britain due to the aristocracy preferring to entertain their guests at home in their own backyards rather than have to travel long distances to play in indoor courts. Lawn tennis soon became the chosen sport of the privileged classes and immense importance was placed on proper etiquette and controlled behaviour.

In a short time it overtook croquet as the most popular British summer sport. The game was further expanded from 1873 by an English army major, Walter Clopton Wingfield, who designed, patented and manufactured equipment. Wingfield created a box, costing five guineas, that included two net posts, a net, racquets and India rubber balls. He named it “Sphairistike” derived from the Greek word for ball games, and it had a subsidiary name of “lawn tennis”. Two brothers, Clarence and Joseph Clark, took the box to America in 1874 where it caught the attention of Mary Outerbridge, whose brother Emilius organised what is believed to be the USA’s first major tennis event.

Tennis Today

The official ILTF Rules of Tenniswere drawn up in Paris in 1923 and implemented from 1 January 1924. In 1977, the ILTF dropped the word “lawn” to take on its present name, the International Tennis Federation (ITF). There are 204 member countries in the ITF.

Tennis at the Olympic Games

Tennis was played at the first Modern Olympic Games in Athens in 1896, one of nine sports on the programme. There were just two events, the men’s singles and doubles. Ireland’s John Boland won the first Olympic tennis gold medal in singles and partnered Freidrich Traun of Germany to gold in the doubles. Women’s singles and doubles, along with mixed doubles, were introduced at the 1900 Paris Olympics.

After the Paris Olympic Games of 1924, tennis did not appear again on the Olympic programme until Seoul in 1988, with professionals allowed to compete.

TRAMPOLINE

5.The Origin of Trampoline Gymnastics

Modern Trampoline Gymnastics came about after he first prototype apparatus was built in 1936 by the George NISSEN (USA) in his garage. As well as being enjoyable at a recreational level, Trampoline Gymnastics has also been used by the Air Force and by space agencies to help pilots and astronauts acclimatise to aerial activity.

Competitive Trampoline Gymnastics began in the USA after World War II. It spread to Europe in the 1950s, aided by visits from George NISSEN. Display teams travelled to all continents in the 1950s and 1960s, a time when many national federations were formed.

In 1958 the first Nissen Cup was held in Switzerland, an event that continues to this day. In 1964, the International Trampoline Federation (FIT) was formed and the first FIT World Championships were held in the same year. European and Pan Pacific Championships soon followed. USA athletes dominated the sport in the early years, but these days many nations share the top honours. The first FIT World Cup took place in 1993, sparking a tremendous interest in the sport.

Trampoline Gymnastics Today

Now recognised as a sport in its own right around the world, it is also utilised as a training tool for many other sports, such as gymnastics, diving and freestyle skiing. Modern trampolines can project gymnasts to great heights, with the sport’s top stars able to touch 10m high ceilings and perform multiple somersaults with ease.

Trampoline Gymnastics at the Olympic Summer Games

Trampoline Gymnastics was performed at the first-ever Olympic gymnastics gala in Atlanta in 1996, and the following year it was granted Olympic status by the IOC. This necessitated the merging of the FIT and the FIG, which was successfully accomplished at the end of 1998, ensuring the debut of Trampoline Gymnastics at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Russians Alexander MOSKALENKO and Irina KARAVAEVA were discipline’s first Olympic Champions. KARAVAEVA was also awarded the IOC Fair Play Recognition by IOC President Jacques ROGGE, for outstanding behaviour, having handed back her world title to Anna DOGONADZE (GER), due to a judging error.

Read More - History of Sports withW

INDO-US War

What would happen if an Indo US war broke out? Indian pilots are better as evinced by the two mock fights. Indians won 9 out of 10 times.

There are some serious misconceptions out there about how air combat training is conducted so I’ve decided to write a post about how it really happens. Everybody seems to want to cite a particular exercise as proof of their point, when in reality, they have no contextual reference for these results they are referencing. Realize that I am writing from a USAF/USN/USMC/NATO perspective. If anyone else can provide some information about how it’s done elsewhere, please chime in.

Air-to-air combat is an extremely complex and dynamic undertaking. The combination of speed and the ability to maneuver in three dimensions creates an environment that is constantly changing and rarely allows any of the participants to see and understand the entire picture at once. In order to be successful in this environment, participants must be highly skilled, (reasonably) intelligent individuals who fight in these types of battles regularly.

Fighter pilots from countries all over the world are expected to use hardware purchased with national treasure to defend their homeland against attackers or attack others as directed by their leaders. In order to effectively accomplish those missions, pilots must regularly train for air combat. Air combat skills are perishable and even the best pilots are not as keen as they might be if they haven’t flown in a while – especially when flying in large force exercises where one decision may be the difference between success and failure.

Definitions: Air Combat Training (ACT) is a term used to describe a battle between similar aircraft. If 2 F-16s are fighting against 2 other F-16s, this would be an ACT war, whereas 2 F-15s fighting 2 F-16s would be termed Dissimilar Air Combat Training (DACT).

When planning a DACT exercise, planners typically will build an Offensive Counterair (OCA) strike package and Defensive Counterair (DCA) package with appropriate aircraft - this was displayed in the Cope India exercise when a strike package consisting of SU-30s, Mirages, and Jaguars attacked a target defended by F-15s. Besides designating types of aircraft and missions, planners will also draw up objectives for the exercise. These objectives can be very specific or quite broad depending on the situation.

A broad objective may be stated as “building trust between countries” or “familiarize pilots with other air forces.” More specific objectives may be “effectively integrate air forces for lane defense.” In order to accomplish these objectives, rules of engagement (ROE) will also be set.

ROE consist of weapons load, identification criteria, maneuvering limitations, tactics restrictions, and just about anything else you can think of. ROE can be pretty liberal or very restrictive, depending on the objectives, experience level of the pilots, or number and type of aircraft involved. If the objective is to “build trust” between nations, you can bet your ass that the rules are going to be damn restrictive to try to ensure there will be no accidents/dangerous or stupid stunts that would embarrass one side or the other or result in needless loss of life. This is why briefings are conducted, and “pickup games” are not allowed. (This is also the reason why this article about the Typhoons getting bounced by F-15Es is absolute *******s.) Regardless of the particular ROE established, somebody needs to be the bad guy.

In most exercises there will be a threat aircraft and weapons designated as the training aid for the other side. In U.S. exercises such as Red Flag, this will be something like a MiG-29 with aa-10s and aa-11s, and will be referred to as “opfor” or “red air.” Red air will usually consist of F-15s or F-16s (or whatever they can get) and will do their best to simulate that threat by limiting their radar modes, lock ranges, tactics, etc. “Blue air” will fly with their normal weapons loadout and will normally not have any restrictions other than operating their systems in a training/peacetime mode. There may be other restrictions imposed based on the objectives. Typically, the threat capabilities will start out low – short range missiles and very benign tactics, then increase as the exercise continues, as long as the blue air players are learning something and they are ready to progress to the next level. If the blue air fighters are getting their butts handed to them, the threat level will remain low, but if they are doing well, the threat capability will increase so the training is useful.

Notice that the red air players are training aids. They are supposed to follow the rules and die like men when blue air is executing well. If, however, the blue air screws something up and they have an opportunity to kick some tail, they are expected to do so. Violating the ROE by using a capability that is restricted, shooting beyond a specified range, or not adhering to an established ID criteria is considered a training rule violation and is dealt with severely. Several pilots have been sent home from exercises and have even been reassigned because they didn’t like to follow the rules.

By now it should becoming clear why one side or the other in these exercises often has a larger kill:loss ratio than the other. Red air is supposed to die – even if there are more capable aircraft on the red side. This is how many of the “surprising” results occur in large exercises – the threat level is tailored to the training needs of the blue air so they can learn from their mistakes in the debrief.

When conducting the debrief, kills must be assessed in order to find out what really happened. In order to do this, pilots must review the recording of the mission so they can evaluate their targeting and weapons employment. Red and blue air will get together, exchange data, and together decide who shot who and when. This is often an inexact science, however, with ACMI monitoring and extensive recording equipment in the aircraft, it is getting better. With results in hand, the blue fighters can then determine what they did wrong, and how to do better next time. This training is very effective for the blue air, but it usually sucks for red. What about exercises with real “threat” aircraft like MiG-29s, MiG-25s, etc? This is obviously the best training there can be, however, there is a problem.

When participating in an international exercise, both sides are probably going to hold some information back. This is not a “you show me yours, I’ll show you mine” game. In many cases, the shot data/weapons performance is classified, and not releasable to those on the other side. This is exactly the case in Cope India 04.

How do you debrief an engagement when neither side wants to say what really happened? Nobody is going to walk into the debrief and say “I shot that guy at this time and this range with this missile,” because they are basically giving away their capabilities. There are a couple of ways to deal with this, one of which is to not relay any of the shot information, but to merely say “that guy is dead at this time.” In that situation, no information (other than the f-pole) is released to the other side. However, astute people on the other side can extrapolate the data and figure out approximately when the shot was fired and can have a pretty good idea as to the performance of the missile. The other thing you can do is to establish a theoretical missile, with a nominal range to be used by both sides. This levels the playing field and rewards the side which executes better, rather than the side with the longer range missiles.

Detailed assessments that would normally take place to validate shots can’t/won’t happen in an exercise like this, therefore the overall results are not really accurate. However, as you say, they most certainly will debrief to get some results regardless of the potential inaccuracies. How valid the results are depends on how the exercise was planned.

As you can see, the results of these exercises (especially those released to the public) are quite likely not accurate. And, for one side or the other to claim victory in one of these exercises is either dishonest or just plain ignorance. Normally, the results are released as a series of politically correct statements such as those we’ve seen by the authorities after Cope India. Both sides are happy, they learned a lot, and can’t wait to do it again.

It should be noted that these types of exercises are planned many months in advance. A key part of the training syllabus is to agree on the types of scenarios to be performed during initial planning.

Most of the learning experience occurs on the ground, not in the air. The evolution from Air Tasking Order to Mission Planning/C3I/Asset Coordination to Aircraft Generation is where air battles are won or lost. The mechanics of flying airplanes and shooting off ordnance is icing on the cake.

I’m certainly not trying to stifle the spirited debate that goes on here. It’s fun reading the arguments for and against various aircraft, however, be careful when you’re quoting the results of some exercise when making your point!

I’m only saying that without details, all of this, “my airplane kicked your airplane’s butt” is entertaining, but silly. One valuable part of the exercise is simply watching how the other side operates, what kind of tactics they use (they may have been “modified” along with the weapons), how they talk on the radio, etc. Obviously, the technology represented by the Su-30s is of great interest to the USAF also.

I Found This Article On A Forum And was written by a NATO planner.

Indian AIRFORCE vs American AIRFORCE

What would happen if an Indo US war broke out? Indian pilots are better as evinced by the two mock fights. Indians won 9 out of 10 times.

5 Reasons;Cricket not in olympics

1. It is because a single match of cricket takes about 8 hours ,which means a full ground has to be kept reserved for the whole day.

2.In the whole world about 18-20 countries only play cricket,but olympic is for the whole world.

3.For cricket matches a complete new ground has to be made which means more expenditure.

4.Cricket is a famous game ,so most of the people will watch it,that vmeans other stadiums will remain empty.

5.Time spent for watching cricket is much more than watching a exciting football or hockey match.

But with the new version of cricket Twenty -20 we can expect cricket to be included in olympics in near future.

What do you think why cricket is not an event in olympic?
Even why not twenty 20?